University of Rwanda Digital Repository

A comparative study of appendicitis inflammatory response score and abdominal ultrasound in evaluation of patients with acute appendicitis at university teaching hospital of Kigali (CHUK)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author RWAGAHIRIMA, Elisée
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-09T12:00:13Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-09T12:00:13Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1920
dc.description Master's Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Acute appendicitis is a common disease in surgical practice. Its usual presentation is often not classical, leaving a diagnostic problem in some cases. Using a scoring system that incorporates the inflammatory variables such as AIR score can improve and overcome this drawback. Aim of the study: To compare AIR score and abdominal U/S in evaluation of patients with acute appendicitis and to determine if AIR score can decrease the time and cost of care of patients with acute appendicitis. Patients and Methods: This prospective descriptive observational study included 42 patients who underwent appendectomy from June 2018 to May 2019. All parameters included in the AIR score and U/S results were collected and statistical analysis performed using SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics and diagnostic performance of AIR score and U/S were compared. Results: We found 26 males and 16 females, M: F was 1.62:1. Age range was 7-55 years. Peak age: 26-35 years, with a mean of 31.26 years. The mean symptoms duration was 2.4 days. AIR score ranged from 5 to 12. 26 patients were classified into the indeterminate group and 16 patients into high-probability group. U/S request was associated with a longer mean time from admission to surgery (11 hours versus 5.3 hours). AIR score had a sensitivity and specificity of 43% and 100% respectively, while U/S had sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 20% respectively. AIR score demonstrated a higher specificity (100%) in high probability group while U/S showed a better sensitivity and specificity for indeterminate group of 94% and 100% respectively. U/S had a higher PPV (100%) than AIR score (86%) and AIR score showed a better NPV (67%) compared to U/S (19%). The ROC area of AIR score was 0.738 for AIR score and 0.562 for U/S (p = 0.09). Negative appendectomy rate was 11.9%. Conclusion: AIR score is more specific and accurate in high probability patients and also convincingly select patients who need abdominal U/S for diagnosis. Abdominal U/S is better at confirming the diagnosis or to rule out the possibility of appendicitis in equivocal cases. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Rwanda en_US
dc.subject Acute appendicitis, AIR score, U/S. en_US
dc.title A comparative study of appendicitis inflammatory response score and abdominal ultrasound in evaluation of patients with acute appendicitis at university teaching hospital of Kigali (CHUK) en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Browse

My Account