University of Rwanda Digital Repository

Knowledge and Receptiveness of Epidural Labor Analgesia by Parturients at Two Teaching Hospitals in a Rwanda Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hakorimana, Fidèle
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-24T09:43:51Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-24T09:43:51Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.ur.ac.rw/handle/123456789/2089
dc.description Master's Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Pain during labor and delivery can be severe and unbearable and differently perceived by parturient. Even with advances in medicine and awareness of labor analgesics, providing epidural for labor analgesia is still challenging due to a variety of factors including cultural pressure to experience normal labor, cost and of side effects. The aim was to evaluate the knowledge and receptiveness of parturient toward epidural for labor analgesia and also factors that affect receptiveness of labor analgesia. Methods: The study was analytical cross sectional and source of information was from the pregnant mothers attending antenatal care at university teaching hospital (CHUB and CHUK) during period of study of six months, from January 2022 to June 2022. Results: We recruited 388 participants with median age of 31 years. Thirty percent of the participants were aware of the existence of the epidural for labor analgesia and 33.61% of them knew the location of epidural labor analgesia. Fifty-five percent (55.61%) preferred epidural analgesia while 35.2% preferred intravenous labor analgesia. Women with university level were 6.5 times more likely to be aware of labor analgesia as those who attended at most the primary school (OR=6.52; 95% CI:2.45-17.36; P<0.001) Previous high pain intensity were 5.4 times more likely to be aware of the existence of labor analgesia as those who did not have pain (OR=5.38; 95% CI: 1.92-15.03; p=0.001). Primipara was 1.8 more likely to request the labor analgesia during the next labor as those who were multipara (OR= 1.82; 95% CI: 1.05-3.16; p=0.034); participants who expressed severe pain during the previous labor were 4.5 times more likely to have the desire to request the analgesia during the next labor as those who did not have pain (OR=4.52; 95% CI: 2.01-10.18; p<0.001) and participants who were in the Ubudehe third category were less likely to request the analgesia during their next labor as those who were in the first category of Ubudehe (OR=0.19; 95%CI: 0.40-0.97; p=0.047) Conclusion: This study showed that knowledge and receptiveness of epidural labor analgesia was low. More education of parturients using different methods especially for low educational level can result to the improvement en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Rwanda en_US
dc.publisher University of Rwanda en_US
dc.subject Knowledge, Receptiveness, epidural for labor analgesia, low-resource en_US
dc.title Knowledge and Receptiveness of Epidural Labor Analgesia by Parturients at Two Teaching Hospitals in a Rwanda Analytical Cross-Sectional Study en_US
dc.title.alternative Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for Award of the Degree of Master of Medicine in Anesthesiology en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Browse

My Account