Impact of “quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment” (qSOFA) at admission to the Intensive Care Unit on hospital outcome for critically ill patient at Kigali University Teaching Hospital

dc.contributor.authorMBAHIRE, Remy Steve
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T10:40:25Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T10:40:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionMaster's Dissertationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with an increasing incidence. The qSOFA is used as a screening tool for sepsis in developed countries. This study aims to determine the impact of qSOFA in the prediction of outcome in adult patients admitted to the ICU of Kigali University Teaching Hospital (CHUK), with or without a suspected infection. Methodology: Data of adult patients admitted in ICU of CHUK were retrospectively and prospectively collected from May 2019 to December 2020. I entered data in Epi-Info version 3 then defined high versus low-risk groups according to their qSOFA scores. I calculated raw mortality and prognostic performance values for both risk groups and analyzed AUROC as primary outcome and average ICU length of stay and post- ICU discharge mortality rate as secondary outcome. Results: The study consisted of 148 participants. One hundred and forty one were enrolled for analysis with 40 (28.4%) in the high-risk group (qSOFA score ≥2) and 101 (71.6%) in the low-risk group. The median age was 33 (IQR: 24-41.5) for the high-risk group, which was significantly smaller than the median age of 40 (IQR: 31-59) for the low-risk group. ICU and post-ICU discharge mortality rate in the high-risk vs. low-risk group was 20% and 0% vs. 19.6% and 3.5% respectively. The prognostic performance value of the qSOFA score (with a cutoff of 2) in predicting ICU mortality consisted of 29% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 21% positive predictive value, and 80% negative predictive value. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.555 (95% CI -.528-0.589). The median ICU length of stay was 6 days (IQR 2-10) and 5 days (IQR 3-11) for the high-risk vs. low-risk group with an absolute difference of 2.89 (95% CI -1.83 to 7.62, p-value 0.118). Conclusion: Following the index study it was found that the qSOFA score was a poor predictor of ICU outcomes in this setting.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1872
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Rwandaen_US
dc.subjectSepsis, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Intensive care Uniten_US
dc.titleImpact of “quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment” (qSOFA) at admission to the Intensive Care Unit on hospital outcome for critically ill patient at Kigali University Teaching Hospitalen_US
dc.title.alternativeResearch work submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Master of Medicine in Anaesthesiology.en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dr. Mbahire Steve.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Master's Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: